By C. F. Larry Heimann
Complicated and dicy technologies--technologies comparable to new medications for the therapy of AIDS that promise nice merits to our society yet hold major risks--pose many difficulties for political leaders and the coverage makers answerable for overseeing them. Public organizations reminiscent of the nutrients and Drug management are informed through political superiors to not inhibit very important technological advances and will also be charged with selling such improvement yet should also ensure that no significant injuries take place less than their watch. Given the massive charges linked to catastrophic injuries, most of the people and elected officers usually call for trustworthy or failure-free administration of those applied sciences and feature little tolerance for the mistake. examine during this zone has result in a schism among those that argue that it truly is attainable to have trustworthy administration thoughts and thoroughly deal with advanced applied sciences and others who contend that such keep watch over is tough at top. during this ebook C. F. Larry Heimann advances a tremendous option to this challenge via constructing a normal idea of organizational reliability and organization choice making. The ebook seems to be at either exterior and inner impacts on reliability in organization selection making. It then checks theoretical propositions built in a comparative case examine of 2 businesses concerned with the dealing with of dicy applied sciences: NASA and the manned area flight software and the FDA's dealing with of pharmaceuticals--particularly new AIDS cures. Drawing on thoughts from engineering, organizational conception, political technological know-how, and choice thought, this e-book can be of curiosity to these attracted to technology and know-how coverage, bureaucratic administration and reform, in addition to these attracted to wellbeing and fitness and area coverage. C. F. Larry Heimann is Assistant Professor of Political technology, Michigan nation college.
Read Online or Download Acceptable Risks: Politics, Policy, and Risky Technologies PDF
Similar public affairs & administration books
Representing the main wide learn on public employment, those volumes discover the unconventional alterations that experience taken position within the configuration of nationwide public companies as a result of a common growth of public employment that used to be by way of stagnation and reduces. Part-time employment and the involvement of girls additionally elevated as an element of the general public zone and have been associated with crucial development parts reminiscent of the tutorial, well-being care and private social companies sectors.
Development at the event of 1000s of initiatives and programmes over greater than a decade, it is a complete research of East-West co-operation in public-sector reform because the cave in of communism. After constructing a framework of comparability, the editors have accrued a chain of analytical case experiences of co-operative programmes in vital and jap Europe and the previous Soviet Union.
The purpose of this paintings of reference is to supply an entire year-by-year checklist of officers from archaic and classical Athens, in addition to, the place acceptable, a brief realize in their actions, together with all of the facts bearing on an individual's workplace in a selected 12 months. It additionally comprises all country decrees datable to any 12 months or which include correct info.
How powerful are public managers as they search to persuade how public enterprises carry coverage effects? How, and what sort of, is administration regarding the functionality of public courses? What elements of administration may be extraordinary? Can their separable contributions to functionality be envisioned? The destiny of public guidelines in contemporary global lies within the palms of public companies, which in flip are usually intertwined with others in latticed styles of governance.
- Marketing in the Public Sector: A Roadmap for Improved Performance
- The Iraq Study Group Report: The Way Forward - A New Approach (Vintage)
- The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government
- Current Issues And Trends in E-Government Research (Advances in Electronic Government Research)
Additional info for Acceptable Risks: Politics, Policy, and Risky Technologies
Most agencies seek to appease as broad an audience as possible because political uncertainty is an inherent part of our system of government. Groups or individuals in power at one point in time cannot remain in power indefinitely; they are eventually put out in favor of some other set of interests. Hence, by shifting resources to other areas, the agency is able to hedge its bets in light of such uncertainty by pacifying those interests that are not in power today but could be tomorrow. 34 Acceptable Risks Interestingly, this type of behavior becomes problematic when the technology itself is highly reliable.
If (c2 - c l , > 0), then we would expect (because of property 2) that if the agency were policy neutral, it would adjust its effort level toward e2 until Um - Un! = O. By the result obtained above, however. 2 - Un! = Uri U r2 . If uri> u r2 , then the agency will allocate less etfort to preventing type II errors than would be warranted by economic costs; if U r2 > urI' then the agency is allocating more effort to type II failures than economic conditions alone dictate. It is clear that bureaucratic preferences lead the agency to choose an effort allocation that, based on cost considerations alone, is unwarranted.
If one type of error were more visible than the otherleading to a higher probability of punishment-it makes sense for the agency to devote more effort to lowering the probability of occurrence. That is a Reliable Decision Making 21 politically smart choice for the agency. If the more visible error, however, is not the more costly one in an economic sense, the agency may be shifting its effort away from preventing errors that are more damaging to its constituency in order to reduce the probability that the organization suffers political losses.